By Patrick Oliver Graf, General Manager, NCP engineering
At the end of last year, we spent some time discussing a few projected network security trends for 2013. While there was room for debate on some topics, most people agreed that there was a clear need for more secure authentication methods. In hindsight, it appears that the experts were correct, and the traditional combination of username and password is no longer a strong enough security barrier to ward off hackers with increasingly sophisticated tools. But, this doesn’t mean that there is one answer that solves every problem.
Two-factor authentication in particular has received heightened media attention in recent weeks. Many users on Twitter, one of the fastest growing social networking platforms in the world, are clamoring for it in light of recent high-profile hacks. Most notably perhaps, the Associated Press (AP) handle was used to tweet (falsely) that President Obama was injured in a White House explosion. After the ruse was exposed, one glaring question emerged in the minds of security experts: could it have been prevented if Twitter used two-factor authentication?
In reality, two-factor authentication – a security process in which the user provides two means of identification – may not have prevented this attack. The Syrian Electronic Army, which claimed responsibility, reportedly obtained login credentials from a phishing email attack that prompted employees to enter their usernames and passwords. If this is true, Dan Kaplan of SC Magazine correctly points out that the perpetrators could have easily added another field for that second means of identification.
What we should learn from this is that there is no one magic technology that applies to every situation. However, robust security software combined with proper employee education on security best practices can help safeguard companies against most of today’s cyber threats.
The NCP Secure Enterprise Management software, for example, administers a one-time password that users receive via SMS. Each password is created by a random number generator within the NCP Advanced Authentication Connector and is automatically canceled after use. This eliminates the need to use third party solutions and enables two-factor authentication with only a mobile or smartphone. Ultimately, this creates additional security hurdles that hackers must clear in order to obtain access to sensitive company content.
English
German 


Mobile Endpoint Security Limitations a Hot Topic at Interop Las Vegas 2013
Posted: 30th April 2013 by VPN Haus in Industry Commentary, IT policy, Rethink Remote Access, Shows, VPNTags: Android, BYOD, firewalls, Interop Las Vegas, Network Security, VPN
*Editor’s note: This blog originally appeared as a guest post on the Interop Blog
By: Rainer Enders, CTO, Americas at NCP engineering.
The Android mobile platform and its oft-publicized security limitations, along with those of other mobile operating systems (OSs), are guaranteed to be a hot topic at this year’s Interop event. After all, they have even caught the attention of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which filed a complaint against the four major cellular carriers in the U.S. for not doing enough to protect the private information of subscribers using the Android OS.
The security concerns associated with Android shouldn’t shock anyone. We’ve known there were problems for a long time now, and other popular platforms like iOS are not immune either. But, thanks to the bring-your-own-device (BYOD) and consumerization of IT trends, the implications of such issues are now much more significant. Enterprise network security architects and managers are limited in their abilities to secure certain remote access connections due to the lack of open APIs for security relevant functions, such as VPN and Device Firewall, in most mobile platforms. This also means that neither carriers nor enterprises can effectively deploy and manage such features built into a mobile OS to meet their specific security needs. So, if they choose to stick with the native security functions, if they exist at all, they are at the mercy of many limitations.
The consumerization of mobile devices has led to another serious side effect: significant relevant security functions, required by major industry verticals and government entities around the world, are missing in action.
It is clear that BYOD is no passing fad, and that companies in every industry must find ways to make it work without compromising their IT infrastructures and the sensitive data contained within them. With each passing day, more and more organizations recognize the need to go beyond the one-size-fits-all approach that comes with most mobile devices and OSs, and instead focus on technologies that combine the security they need with the convenience users demand. Additionally, the mobile device industry must be more concerned and engaged in endpoint protection strategies and technologies if these limitations are to be permanently fixed.
How and when the industry addresses these issues remains to be seen, but it is evident that BYOD and the consumerization of IT will not slow down to let Android, iOS or any other platform catch up. This means that businesses must take a proactive approach to meeting the security needs that the mobile platforms’ built-in features cannot presently live up to.
Keep your ears and eyes open at Interop Las Vegas 2013 – we think this security topic will prove to be among the most popular.