<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a 64-bit ipsec client enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/2010/02/11/is-a-64-bit-ipsec-client-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/2010/02/11/is-a-64-bit-ipsec-client-enough/</link>
	<description>Rethinking Remote Access</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/2010/02/11/is-a-64-bit-ipsec-client-enough/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Witherspoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/?p=880#comment-384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It depends on the needs of the user. ipsec is supported on the iphone, and also on many other devices. I think for now it is a good step. I would like to see the implementation of SSL VPNs, but there needs to be more support to bring this feature into business. Cisco Charges irate amounts for SSL connections on their ASA lines.

Personally, I would like to see security move away from centralized secure internal networks, and concentrate on making more flexible networks that are capable of securely spanning the open internet. I would also like to see this effort aided by IPV6.

Just some thoughts, but I do agree the conventional VPN is viable, and works, but is not a &#039;great&#039; solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on the needs of the user. ipsec is supported on the iphone, and also on many other devices. I think for now it is a good step. I would like to see the implementation of SSL VPNs, but there needs to be more support to bring this feature into business. Cisco Charges irate amounts for SSL connections on their ASA lines.</p>
<p>Personally, I would like to see security move away from centralized secure internal networks, and concentrate on making more flexible networks that are capable of securely spanning the open internet. I would also like to see this effort aided by IPV6.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts, but I do agree the conventional VPN is viable, and works, but is not a &#8216;great&#8217; solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

