Comments on: Split Tunneling http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/2010/01/13/split-tunneling/ Rethinking Remote Access Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:25:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Don’t Worry, IPv6 Won’t Break Your Existing IPsec VPN, Part 2 « VPN Haus http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/2010/01/13/split-tunneling/#comment-1096 Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:03:39 +0000 http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/?p=833#comment-1096 [...] Check whether they support native IPv6 end-to-end, for a full backbone if possible, as opposed to ‘split tunneling’ – we feel the latter is not a good idea and have concerns about that approach. Some ISPs are [...]

]]> By: Split Tunneling: Part II « VPN Haus http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/2010/01/13/split-tunneling/#comment-318 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:00:12 +0000 http://vpnhaus.ncp-e.com/?p=833#comment-318 [...] Categories: Troubleshoot Last month, we wrote about Rene Poot’s thoughts on split tunneling.  Here is the second installment from that conversation: Spilt tunneling can also be used in [...]

]]>